On December 23, 2024, a 19-year-old engineering student was allegedly assaulted on the Anna University campus in Chennai. The victim reported that she and her male friend were attacked by Gnanasekaran, a 37-year-old roadside vendor with a history of criminal offences, who threatened them and subsequently assaulted her.
The case has sparked widespread outrage, leading to protests and political debates regarding women’s safety in Tamil Nadu especially with the concerning nature in which the preliminary investigation of the case was conducted with shoddy FIRs and alleged political interventions.
The Madras High Court has since intervened in the case forming a Special Investigation Team (SIT) to ensure a thorough investigation and ordered the state government to provide interim compensation of ₹25 lakh to the survivor.
The incident has also drawn attention to the alleged political connections of the accused, with opposition parties, particularly the AIADMK and BJP, accusing the ruling DMK of shielding him due to his affiliations. The National Commission for Women (NCW) has initiated its own investigation, highlighting systemic failures in campus security and the handling of the case by law enforcement. As a symbol of protest and to seek justice for the survivor, K. Annamalai, the TN BJP chief was also seen flogging himself and walking barefoot.
With a culmination of social and political factors, the case has become a focal point for discussions on women’s safety, political accountability, and the need for institutional reforms in educational settings across the state of Tamil Nadu.
Jargon
- Politicised: Refers to the act of using a serious issue, such as a sexual assault case, for political gain or to further a political agenda rather than addressing the core issue at hand, which is women’s safety.
- First Information Report (FIR): A written document prepared by the police when they receive information about a cognisable offence, which initiates the investigation process.
- Special Investigation Team (SIT): A team formed by the police or government to investigate a specific case, often comprising senior officers with expertise in handling sensitive or high-profile cases.
- National Commission for Women (NCW): A statutory body established to review the constitutional and legal safeguards for women, recommend remedial legislative measures, and ensure the effective implementation of laws for women’s rights.
Viewpoints 💭
- The left emphasises the need for systemic reforms in campus security and criticises the handling of the case by law enforcement, highlighting the negligence of the Tamil Nadu police in previous complaints against the accused.
- They advocate for a transparent investigation and stress the importance of addressing the root causes of such incidents, including societal attitudes towards women and the need for institutional accountability.
- The left criticises the politicisation of the case, arguing that it detracts from genuine efforts to ensure women’s safety and calls for a focus on the victim’s protection rather than political agendas.
- They support the formation of a Special Investigation Team (SIT) and the involvement of the National Commission for Women (NCW) to ensure a thorough investigation and propose preventive measures.
- The left calls for improved safety measures in educational institutions, including the implementation of technology-backed security systems and awareness programs to promote inclusivity and respectful behaviour among students.
- The left focuses on systemic reforms and institutional accountability, advocating for improved campus security and addressing societal attitudes towards women, while the right emphasises political accountability and criticises the ruling DMK for alleged connections to the accused.
- While the left supports the involvement of the National Commission for Women and the formation of a Special Investigation Team to ensure a thorough investigation, the right demands a CBI probe, questioning the impartiality of the state government’s investigation.
- The left criticises the politicisation of the case, arguing it detracts from genuine efforts to ensure women’s safety, whereas the right uses the incident to challenge the DMK’s governance and highlight perceived failures in law and order.
- The left calls for preventive measures and awareness programs to promote inclusivity and respectful behaviour among students, while the right organises protests and rallies to demand justice and accountability from the state government.
- The left emphasises the need for institutional reforms and improved safety measures in educational settings, while the right focuses on political accountability and the alleged protection of the accused by the ruling party.
- The right criticises the DMK government for its handling of the case, alleging political connections of the accused and accusing the ruling party of shielding him.
- They emphasise the need for a CBI investigation to ensure impartiality and question the DMK’s ability to conduct a fair probe, drawing parallels to previous cases like the Pollachi incident.
- The right highlights the increase in crimes against women under the current DMK regime and demands accountability from the state government, using the case to challenge the DMK’s governance.
- The right accuses the DMK of attempting to cover up the crime and calls for stricter punitive measures against the accused, emphasising the need for swift justice and improved safety protocols on campus.
Prominent Voices 📣
- Thol. Thirumavalavan (VCK founder and Chidambaram MP): Called for a transparent investigation and highlighted the importance of women’s safety in educational settings.
1
- Madras High Court (Judicial Authority): The court criticised the politicisation of the case and emphasised the need to focus on women’s safety and victim privacy.
2
3
- Karti P Chidambaram (Sivaganga MP and AICC member): Criticized Annamalai’s theatrics as immature and unnecessary in political discourse.
4
- S. Sukubala (AIDSO Representative): Criticized the police for leaking the FIR and the college administration for imposing restrictive measures on students.
5