Education Funds' 'Blackmail': Tamil Nadu, Centre, and the Language Debate

The ongoing conflict between Tamil Nadu and the central government over the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020 and its three-language policy has reignited long-standing tensions regarding language and education in the state.

The NEP, introduced by the Union government, advocates for a three-language formula, which includes Hindi, English, and a regional language, a move that has been met with strong resistance from Tamil Nadu’s ruling Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK) party and other regional political entities. The DMK has historically championed a two-language policy, emphasising Tamil and English, rooted in the state’s linguistic identity and historical anti-Hindi agitations. Union Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan’s recent remarks linking the release of crucial educational funds under the Samagra Shiksha scheme to Tamil Nadu’s compliance with the NEP have intensified the dispute, with state leaders accusing the Centre of coercion and “blackmail”. The Tamil Nadu government argues that the imposition of the three-language policy undermines its autonomy and disregards the preferences of its people.

In response, the Centre maintains that the NEP aims to enhance educational standards and promote multilingualism, asserting that no language is being imposed. This standoff not only highlights the complexities of federalism but also raises questions about the balance between national educational standards and regional linguistic rights.

Jargon

Three-language policy: A controversial aspect of the National Education Policy (NEP) that mandates students learn three languages: their mother tongue, Hindi, and English. This policy has faced strong opposition in Tamil Nadu, where a two-language policy (Tamil and English) has been historically upheld.
National Education Policy (NEP): A comprehensive framework introduced by the Indian government in 2020 aimed at overhauling the education system. It emphasises multilingual education, skill development, and a shift towards a more holistic approach to learning.
Samagra Shiksha: A centrally sponsored scheme aimed at improving the quality of school education across India. It integrates various educational initiatives and provides funding to states for implementing educational reforms.
Dravidian movement: A socio-political movement in Tamil Nadu that emerged in the early 20th century, advocating for the rights and identity of Dravidian people. It has significantly influenced the state’s politics, particularly regarding language and education policies.
Two-language policy: The established educational policy in Tamil Nadu that promotes the learning of Tamil and English, rejecting the imposition of Hindi. This policy is rooted in the state’s historical resistance to Hindi dominance.

Viewpoints 💭

‘Left’ Viewpoint

Ideological Differences

‘Right’ Viewpoint

The Tamil Nadu government, led by the DMK, views the NEP’s three-language policy as an imposition on the state’s linguistic autonomy and a threat to its cultural identity.
Tamil Nadu’s opposition to the NEP is rooted in historical resistance to Hindi imposition, maintaining a two-language policy of Tamil and English since the 1960s.
The DMK accuses the central government of using financial leverage to enforce the NEP, framing it as coercion and a violation of state rights.
Tamil Nadu leaders argue that the NEP undermines state control over education and disregards regional linguistic preferences.
The DMK and its allies criticise the central government’s approach as an attempt to enforce linguistic hegemony and undermine federalism.

The left views the NEP’s three-language policy as an imposition on Tamil Nadu’s linguistic autonomy, while the right sees it as a means to promote multilingualism and national integration.
The left emphasises historical resistance to Hindi imposition and the preservation of Tamil Nadu’s cultural identity, whereas the right argues that the NEP respects linguistic diversity and does not mandate Hindi.
The left accuses the central government of using financial leverage to enforce the NEP, framing it as coercion, while the right maintains that the NEP aligns with constitutional norms and aims to improve educational standards.
The left argues that the NEP undermines state control over education and disregards regional linguistic preferences, while the right believes it creates a level playing field and enhances educational opportunities.
The left criticises the central government’s approach as an attempt to enforce linguistic hegemony and undermine federalism, whereas the right accuses the DMK of politicising the issue for electoral gains and emphasises the NEP’s benefits for students.

The central government defends the NEP’s three-language policy as a means to promote multilingual education and enhance national integration.
Union Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan emphasises that the NEP does not impose Hindi but encourages learning multiple languages, including regional ones.
The BJP accuses the DMK of politicising the language policy issue for electoral gains and argues that the NEP aligns with constitutional norms.
The central government argues that the NEP aims to create a level playing field and improve educational standards across the country.
BJP leaders suggest that the three-language policy would benefit students by providing them with more opportunities and aligning with global educational trends.

Prominent Voices 📣

From the ‘Left’

From the ‘Right’

M K Stalin (Chief Minister of Tamil Nadu and DMK president): Criticised the central government for using financial coercion to enforce the NEP and questioned the constitutional basis of the three-language policy, emphasising Tamil Nadu’s commitment to its linguistic heritage. ¹ ²
Udhayanidhi Stalin (Deputy Chief Minister of Tamil Nadu): Reiterated Tamil Nadu’s opposition to the three-language policy, condemning the central government’s coercive tactics and emphasising the state’s educational achievements under the two-language policy. ¹ ³
Anbil Mahesh Poyyamozhi (Tamil Nadu School Education Minister): Accused the Union government of politicising education funding and emphasised Tamil Nadu’s commitment to its two-language policy, urging the release of funds without NEP compliance conditions. ⁴ ²
P Chidambaram (Senior Congress Leader): Criticised the Union Education Minister’s stance as arrogant and emphasised Tamil Nadu’s right to determine its language policy, urging unity against the NEP. ⁵ ⁴
Kanimozhi (DMK MP): Accused the BJP of cultural imposition through language policies and questioned the benefits of learning Sanskrit and Hindi. ⁶ ⁷

Anbumani Ramadoss (PMK president): Criticised the three-language policy as an attack on state autonomy and emphasised the need to preserve Tamil language and culture. ¹ ⁸
Vijay (Actor and Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam chief): Described the Centre’s approach as fascist and an attack on state autonomy. ¹ ⁴
K Selvaperunthagai (Tamil Nadu Congress chief): Highlighted the Centre’s neglect of state rights and condemned the financial discrimination against Tamil Nadu. ¹ ²
Duraimurugan (DMK General Secretary): Expressed strong opposition to the Central government’s language policy, accusing it of betraying Tamil Nadu and vowing resistance to any imposition. ⁹ ¹⁰
Thol Thirumavalavan (VCK President): Stressed the importance of standing against the central government’s efforts to erode Dravidian identity and Tamil culture. ⁹

Show less

Dharmendra Pradhan (Union Education Minister): Defended the NEP as a holistic and inclusive education system, rejecting claims of language imposition and emphasising student choice in language learning. ¹ ³
K Annamalai (Tamil Nadu BJP chief): Criticised the DMK’s opposition to the three-language policy and highlighted the benefits of the NEP. ³ ¹¹
L Murugan (Union Minister and BJP Leader): Defended the NEP as a policy designed to equip youth for global competition without imposing Hindi. ⁵ ¹²
Tamilisai Soundararajan (Former Telangana Governor): Criticised the two-language policy, arguing it limits opportunities for government school students and noting that private schools offer three languages. ¹¹
H Raja (Senior BJP leader): Announced protests against DMK schools teaching Hindi, questioning language policy consistency. ¹¹

Vanathi Srinivasan (Coimbatore South MLA): Highlighted benefits of the three-language policy for diverse linguistic students and clarified NEP’s language stance. ¹¹

Show less