The recent split verdict by the Supreme Court of India regarding former Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) councillor and current AIMIM MLA-hopeful Tahir Hussain’s plea for interim bail has drawn significant attention, particularly in the context of the upcoming Delhi Assembly elections.
Hussain, who is currently facing serious charges related to the 2020 Delhi riots, including the murder of Intelligence Bureau staffer Ankit Sharma, sought temporary release to campaign as a candidate for the All India Majlis-e-Ittehadul Muslimeen (AIMIM) from the Mustafabad constituency.
The two-judge SC bench, comprising Justices Pankaj Mithal and Ahsanuddin Amanullah, delivered contrasting opinions; Justice Mithal dismissed the plea, citing concerns that granting bail for electoral campaigning could set a dangerous precedent, potentially allowing every undertrial to seek similar relief, thereby overwhelming the judicial system. He emphasized that the right to contest elections is not a fundamental right and highlighted the risk of Hussain influencing witnesses if released.
Conversely, Justice Amanullah acknowledged the gravity of the allegations but argued that they remain unproven and that Hussain’s prolonged incarceration, nearly five years, warranted consideration for interim bail. He granted bail until February 4, 2025, under strict conditions, including a prohibition on discussing the pending cases during his campaign.
The matter has now been referred to the Chief Justice of India for further adjudication, reflecting the complex interplay between individual rights, electoral participation, and the integrity of the judicial process in cases involving serious criminal allegations.
Jargon
- interim bail: A temporary release from custody granted by a court, allowing an accused to be free for a specified period, often under certain conditions, while awaiting trial or further legal proceedings.
- split verdict: A decision made by a court where the judges do not unanimously agree, resulting in differing opinions on the matter at hand.
- fundamental right: A basic human right that is guaranteed by the constitution, which cannot be infringed upon by the government or other entities.
- custody parole: A temporary release from custody for a specific purpose, such as attending to legal matters or participating in elections, while still being under the supervision of the authorities.
- undertrial: A person who is in custody while awaiting trial or the outcome of their case, often without having been convicted of a crime.
Viewpoints 💭
- The left emphasises the importance of individual rights and the presumption of innocence, arguing that Tahir Hussain’s prolonged detention without conviction undermines these principles.
- They highlight the need for electoral participation as a democratic right, suggesting that denying interim bail for campaigning restricts political engagement.
- Criticism is directed at the slow judicial process, with the left questioning the delay in trial proceedings and the limited examination of witnesses over five years.
- The left argues that the severity of allegations should not automatically preclude bail, especially when similar cases have seen bail granted.
- They express concerns about potential biases in the judicial system, suggesting that political motivations may influence decisions against granting bail.
- The left views the denial of interim bail as a violation of democratic rights and individual liberties, while the right sees it as a necessary measure to uphold the integrity of the judicial process.
- While the left criticises the slow pace of the trial and prolonged detention as unjust, the right focuses on the gravity of the charges and potential risks to the trial’s integrity.
- The left argues for the presumption of innocence and the need for political participation, whereas the right emphasises the potential for misuse of bail and the importance of maintaining public order.
- Concerns about political bias in judicial decisions are raised by the left, contrasting with the right’s focus on the legal and ethical implications of allowing accused individuals to campaign.
- The left advocates for bail based on the principle of fairness and past precedents, while the right prioritises the seriousness of the allegations and the potential impact on witnesses and the trial.
- The right prioritises the integrity of the judicial process, arguing that granting interim bail for election purposes could set a dangerous precedent for other undertrials.
- They emphasise the seriousness of the charges against Hussain, including murder and conspiracy, as justification for denying bail.
- Concerns are raised about the potential for witness tampering and influencing the trial if Hussain is released, given his alleged role in the riots.
- The right argues that contesting elections is not a fundamental right and should not be prioritised over legal proceedings.
- They support the view that individuals accused of serious crimes should be barred from contesting elections to maintain public trust in the electoral process.
Prominent Voices 📣
- Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah (Supreme Court Judge): Advocated for interim bail for Tahir Hussain, emphasising the prolonged detention without trial and the importance of personal liberty.
1
2
- Siddharth Aggarwal (Senior Advocate for Tahir Hussain): Argued for interim bail, highlighting Hussain’s extended custody and the need to campaign, while pointing out delays in the trial process.
3
4
- Rebecca John (Senior Advocate for Hussain): Supported interim bail for Hussain, citing his long custody and readiness to accept conditions, emphasising the need for a fair trial.
5
6
- Justice Pankaj Mithal (Supreme Court Judge): Opposed interim bail for Tahir Hussain, citing the seriousness of the charges and potential risks of setting a precedent for other undertrials.
1
2
- SV Raju (Additional Solicitor General ): Argued against interim bail, emphasising the gravity of the charges and potential influence on witnesses.
- Justice Neena Bansal Krishna (Delhi High Court Judge): Had earlier denied interim bail, highlighting the severity of the charges and the number of FIRs against Hussain.
7
8