The topic of USAID funding in India has gained significant attention recently, particularly following remarks by U.S. President Donald Trump regarding a purported a $21 million allocation from its funds aimed at boosting voter turnout in the 2024 General Elections in India.
This funding, initially reported by the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), led by Elon Musk, was included in a list of cancelled projects as part of a broader cost-cutting initiative. Trump’s comments suggested that the funding was an attempt to influence electoral outcomes, raising concerns about foreign interference in India’s democratic processes.
The Ministry of External Affairs in India has described these revelations as “deeply troubling”, prompting investigations into the matter.
Historically, USAID’s involvement in India dates back to 1951, evolving from food aid to various developmental projects, including health and education. However, the recent controversy has sparked a political clash between the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and the Congress opposition, with both parties accusing each other of leveraging foreign influence for electoral gain. The BJP has linked the funding to allegations of Congress’s collusion with foreign entities, while Congress has demanded transparency regarding USAID’s financial support over the years. This situation, meanwhile, evolves and underscores the complexities of international aid and its implications for domestic politics in India.
Jargon
- USAID: The United States Agency for International Development, responsible for administering foreign aid and development assistance, often involved in projects aimed at promoting democracy and economic development in various countries.
- Voter turnout: The percentage of eligible voters who cast a ballot in an election.
- Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE): A newly established US government body led by Elon Musk, tasked with auditing and cutting wasteful expenditures across federal agencies, including USAID.
- Foreign interference: The involvement of external entities in a country’s political processes, often viewed negatively as it can undermine national sovereignty and democratic integrity.
Viewpoints 💭
- The left views the USAID funding controversy as a distraction by the BJP to divert attention from its own alleged use of foreign funds to destabilise past Congress-led governments.
- Congress demands a white paper on USAID and other foreign funding in India, criticising the BJP for spreading misinformation about the USD 21 million USAID funds.
- The left emphasises the need for transparency regarding USAID’s historical support in India, dismissing Trump’s claims as nonsensical.
- Congress highlights historical instances of alleged foreign influence and support for the BJP and its ideological predecessors, questioning the BJP’s narrative of foreign interference.
- The left criticises the BJP for its alleged hypocrisy in collaborating with foreign agencies while publicly demonising them.
- The left perceives the USAID funding controversy as a BJP tactic to distract from its own alleged foreign fund usage, while the right sees it as evidence of Congress’s collusion with foreign entities to influence elections.
- While the left demands transparency and a white paper on USAID’s historical support, the right supports Trump’s claims and calls for an investigation into foreign interference.
- The left dismisses Trump’s claims as nonsensical and highlights historical foreign influence on the BJP, whereas the right aligns with Trump’s remarks, viewing them as confirmation of foreign attempts to undermine Modi’s government.
- The left criticises the BJP for alleged hypocrisy in collaborating with foreign agencies, while the right accuses Congress of benefiting from foreign funds and attempting to deflect from these revelations.
- The left emphasises the need for transparency and accountability, while the right focuses on reducing foreign influence and supporting Modi’s narrative of external threats to Indian democracy.
- The right views the USAID funding as a potential foreign interference in India’s electoral process, aligning with PM Modi’s claims of foreign powers trying to prevent his re-election.
- BJP accuses Congress of using foreign funds to influence the 2024 Lok Sabha elections, linking it to Rahul Gandhi’s past remarks about Indian democracy.
- The right supports Trump’s claims, suggesting the funds were used to support ‘deep-state assets’ in India and calls for an investigation.
- BJP highlights the significant decrease in USAID funding to the Indian government under Modi, interpreting it as a reduction in foreign influence.
- The right criticizes the Congress for allegedly benefiting from foreign funding and claims that the opposition is attempting to deflect from these revelations.
Prominent Voices 📣
- Pawan Khera (Congress leader): Criticised BJP for making unverified accusations and highlighted BJP’s past reliance on external forces.
1
2
- Jairam Ramesh (Congress leader): Dismissed Trump’s claims and highlighted USAID’s historical support to India during PM Modi’s tenure.
3
4
- SY Quraishi (Former Chief Election Commissioner of India): Denied any financial dealings with CEPPS or USAID funds being used to increase voter turnout in India.
- Donald Trump (U.S. President): Criticized the Biden administration’s decision to allocate funds for voter turnout in India, suggesting it was an attempt to influence Indian elections.
7
- Ravi Shankar Prasad (BJP MP): Condemned the alleged use of foreign money to influence Indian elections and criticised Congress for undermining India’s democracy.
8
- Amit Malviya (BJP IT Cell Head): Criticised the funding as external interference in India’s electoral process, asserting it did not benefit the ruling party.
